Two things I’m not about to apologise for: being an enormous nerd, and caring about children’s film and literature.
In case you were wondering, mine is the geeky sensibility that animates a lot of the critiques of sci-fi and fantasy in Lashings, including our existing Lion King sketch (which was, if I say so myself, the breakaway hit of our Edinburgh 2010 run – if you haven’t yet had the chance to see twelve grown adults miming carnivorous vaginas for a paying audience, I recommend you rectify this ASAP).
I’ve spent most of my adult life struggling to balance an extremely sharp and pointy feminist nose with a love of all things animated and super-powered, hobbit-ridden and Hogwarts-bound (I draw the line, however, at psychic talking dragons). I love geeky shit enough to ask some really difficult questions about who it serves and what it does: feminists who want to know why I’m wasting my time with this trivial silliness and geeks who whine that I’m harshing their uncritical squee tend to be given equally short shrift.
I also think that there’s nothing less feminist than acting as though children’s literature isn’t important, or that popular children’s texts (such as Disney films) aren’t literature. These things, which are pushed on kids to a ridiculous extent in Western culture (see here and here for discussions, and here for a really interesting alternative take on The Little Mermaid), play a huge role in shaping their inner lives. I don’t mean ‘Oh, kids will watch Superman and then think that they can fly’ or anything so pointlessly reductive: what I mean is that the ranges of characters and situations shown will, in some very real ways, help to shape kids’ senses of what is possible, both within fantasy* and outside it**.
* Eg., a child (generally!) knows that flying is make believe and ze cannot really fly.
** But if flying = a make-believe symbol that stands in for ‘being strong and adventurous’, and child only ever sees a certain type of character getting to fly... well, you tell me.
I think Ursula le Guin puts it best:
As you read a book word by word and page by page, you participate in its creation, just as a cellist playing a Bach suite participates, note by note, in the creation, the coming-to-be, the existence, of the music. And, as you read and re-read, the book participates in the creation of you, your thoughts and feelings, the size and temper of your soul.
-- Ursula K. Le Guin
Disney Princesses are a rant for another day, or possibly even another lifetime. But this is what I have to say about the five things I really wish that ickle baby Galatea hadn’t learned from The Lion King:
1. Girls kick ass! For exactly as long as they need to until the Real Hero shows up.
This is the thing that got me angry enough to write the Lashings skit in the first place. When It All Goes Horribly Wrong at Pride Rock re: evil Machiavellian uncles, young lioness Nala courageously leaves her family and travels across the desert in order to find somebody who can come and put a stop to Scar. She’s the sole surviving hope of her people (mostly because they believe their prince to be dead, but hey, I’ll take my female heroes where I can find them), and gets sent off with a really touching duet in the stage-musical version*.
* Which interests me particularly because it's performed by two women (link is to a video, lyrics here), backed with a chorus of mostly women -- which is not something you see that often in mainstream pop culture, particularly when the song isn't about love or men. Hooray, Bechdel-test-passing on the West End!
But all of that immediately ceases to be important once Simba decides that hmmm, maybe he’ll wander back home and fulfil his patriarchal dest-- er, I mean, claim that pesky kingdom back after all. And answer me this, cats and kittens: if adult!Nala is demonstrably able to knock adult!Simba over and pin him to the ground just as she did when they were cubs... why is that he is able to fight Scar and she isn’t?
What really spins me out is that I’d never even noticed this as a wee’un. Because of course, no matter how strong or brave or clever Nala is, she isn’t The Hero. Of course, she isn’t there to be identified with, or loved in her own right, because she’s The Girl, and no matter how competent she is we’d better not forget that her real job is to look sexy in a disturbingly anthropomorphic fashion during the profoundly G-rated Disneyfied sex-scene.
Phooey.
2. Accents as narrative determinism:
Let’s break it down, shall we?
Standard USAmerican = Hero (Simba, Mufasa, Nala, Sarabi, all the good lionesses)
British RP = highly intelligent, whether for good (Zazu, played by Rowan Atkinson) or for evil (Scar, played by Jeremy Irons).
Working-class Bronx = the Comic Relief (Timon and Pumbaa)
Afro-American/Latino cadences = Comedy Villanous Henchmen (the hyenas, speaking parts voiced by Whoopi Goldberg and Cheech Marin)
Swahili?* = Unfathomably Wise Elder (Rafiki).
It’s particularly worrying that the accents also seem to function as marker of species, and that the more class privilege your accent is associated with, the higher up the food chain you tend to be. Literally.
On the other hand, I do have to give massive props to Niketa Calame and Jason Weaver, who played Young Nala and the singing voice of Young Simba resepctively and were, to the best of my knowledge, the first Black actors to voice a Disney hero and heroine.
* Given that the character is named in Swahili, and speaks a couple of phrases of it, I’m going to assume that that’s what the voice-actor Robert Guillame, who is actually USAmerican, was going for. The racefail in that isn't mine to unpack, particularly as Guillame is African-American, but I do think it's that it's there.
3. Effeminacy Is Evil
Oh Scar, Scar, Scar. Much as you might be the favourite character of every gentleman-fancying person with whom I’ve ever watched this film as an adult, you are still decidedly problematic . Between the dramatic gestures, slinky walk, camp asides about being surrounded by IDIOTS!, and being physically slighter and less muscular than the other lions, it’s fairly easy to read the character as less conventionally-masculine, and I think this is intentional on the film-makers’ behalf. More troublingly, his gender performance seems to be directly linked to his evil nature, as in one scene the character admits that he resorts to conspiracy because he is less physically strong than his brother (‘at the shallow end of the gene pool’). Although in the stage version, part of Scar’s villiany is wanting to ‘marry’ Nala against her will, he shows no interest in her until the idea of a succession is suggested by Zazu – make of that what you will.
For what it’s worth, I wouldn’t really object to Disney fielding a queer villain as a once-off. But it happens with irritating regularity, and it tends to be the only portrayal of non-normative gender performance that gets into mainstream kids’ film. If the only images of gender-unconventionality you see growing up are irrevocably paired with evildom, what does that do to your perception of queers? If you’re a baby queerthing yourself, what does it do to your perception of you?
Well, aside from turn a lot of us into Goths, obviously.
(Full disclaimer: At the time The Lion King came out in cinemas, I was a freakishly tall, skinny pre-teen with an enormous mane of bushy black hair and a withering contempt for anyone not conversant with fractal geometry and the intricacies of the mythos of J.R.R. Tolkien. D’you think I got called ‘Uncle Scar’ every day for a week at break? Answers on a postcard. See also: my ongoing obsession with the bewilderingly high proportion of Disney villians who happen to have green eyes.)
Occasionally I think of the legions of soft-spoken, elegant, evil-intentioned but physically non-violent men who have been the antagonists in every Disney film I grew up with, from Robin Hood ’s Sir Hiss to Aladdin’s Jafar to The Frog Princess’s Dr Facilier. Then I place them alongside the legions of Disney lady-villains who have similarly broken the conventions of gender presentation by being conventionally-unattractive (Ursula the Sea Witch), loud and aggressive (The Red Queen from Alice in Wonderland, Cruella de Ville) or unfemininely ambitious/determined/demanding (Cinderella and Snow White’s stepmothers, Madame Medusa from The Rescuers, the evil Siamese cats from Lady and the Tramp). And then I dance around and around the room, singing at the top of my voice: ‘Thank G*d, thank g*d, thank g*d I’m queer!’.
(Full-on butch ladies, incidentally, don’t exist. Or at least they won’t until Disney makes Mulan, five years later, and that is another post for another day.)
4. Hierarchy Is Natural and Monarchy Is Awesome (particularly when the Royal Family is capable of eating you)
Say what you like about the Royal Wedding Hype that is already tying multiple knots in my organic anti-heteropatriarchy knickers... but not even Princess Anne at the peak of her fox-hunting career was ever known to chase down her subjects with a pack of corgis, rip out their carotid arteries and nom on their juicy still-twitching corpses. ‘Circle of life’, my free-range herbivorous arse.
5. ‘Can You Feel The Love Tonight’
... finally my most deeply-felt and serious objection to this film of all: like anyone else who was a teenager in the 90s, I had to listen to this being played at graduations, school dances, weddings, end-of-year choir numbers, etc until it came out my fucking nose. Eurgh. Sir Elton, I love you like the slightly embarassing Tory-leaning luvvie uncle I never had, but at times you have a lot to answer for.
... and one thing I wish I had:
[TW for discussion of kitty incest]
This has been bothering me for SIXTEEN YEARS now: Seriously, who the hell is Nala’s father?
Either it’s Mufasa, in which case she ends up having kids with her half-brother, or it’s Scar, in which case she ends up being almost pressured into having kids with her Dad (and still ends up having kids with her cousin). I’ve had enough cats in my life to be prepared to give points for animal-behaviour accuracy if turns out that either theory is true, but I think that both of them may cause Disney executives to spontaneously combust. For what it’s worth, a quick Google suggests that I am not the only person to have lost sleep over this. In the extremely unlikely event that I ever come into contact with anyone who worked on the film, I’m going to fix them with my best wide-eyed and innocent expression and ask about it.
Because I am, of course, chock-full of highly-intelligent green-eyed genderqueer evil.
Because I am, of course, chock-full of highly-intelligent green-eyed genderqueer evil.
ReplyDeleteAmen to that!
I am now deeply worried that a large part of my gender presentation was directly informed by Ursula the Sea Witch. And by worried, I mean slightly aroused.
I agree with everything you say here.
ReplyDeleteAs a non-conformative male I have also noticed how non conformativity and evilness seem to be linked in most children's stories/films. Perhaps one of the reasons I've always identified more with the female characters in books and kids films than the male ones.
Also I always Simba was a bit of a bratty spoilt brat. And he never really seems to have real reasons to learn to be more respectful of others, he just is suddenly, apparently, a fantastic King.
Great post. It never occurred to me about Nala being strong enough to take on Scar, but you're so right that is weird. And don't get me started on Scar trying to force her into marriage in the stage show, that was creepy.
ReplyDeleteAs for kitty incest, are there really no other male lions in the pride? I thought there were usually more than two in a pride of lions, having to fight it out for alpha status...
Note: This is Neo_Leviathan. I cannot make this thing recognise me LJ account ><
ReplyDeleteHrm. Some interesting points :). I may need to acquire a copy of the movie and re-watch it. Although re-watching Aladdin was a bit of a mistake, I don't want to ruin the memories...
The main thing tha I normally think about regarding Lion King is how bad a rap the Hyenas have. When Mufasa-the-almighty (bastard) reduces a species to the point where the rallying cry for them to commit regicide is "Stick with me and you'll never go hungry again", there's something very wrong with your "Circle of life".
Thinking about it, I think that #1, #4 & #6 have similar reasonings behind them:
Mufasa, Scar & Simba, near as I've been able to tell *Are* the only males in the pride (which I think is reasonably accurateish?).
so when Mufasa is killed and Simba runs off, the Lionesses (or at least Nala) are faced with "Yes, we could happily beat the shit out of Scar. However, if we do we're left with a Pride with no males, which means we either leave and join another pride, go find a male somewhere, or die out", hence they stick with Scar for now, and in the meantime Nala goes out to try and find a Lion somewhere willing to come back and take over leadership.
Finding a male and making him come back and take the throne, rather than ousting Scar on their own and handing a male the Pride, means they can at least make sure they get a male with (pun intended) some balls.
Then when they get their male to challenge Scar, the females show in no uncertain terms that they were more than capable of beating the living daylights out of Scar's Hyenas. Alas most of the fight screentime is of course given to the Designated Hero Vs Designated Villain fight, but perhaps the Lioness vs Hyena fight was too one-sided :)
I guess I'd thought about Nala beatingt the snot out of Simba and then dragging him back home as a "Sensible female childhood friend beats the shit out of spoiled male brat until he stands up and takes responsibility" type of situation.
Still hardly the most gender-equal setup that it could have been, but I think they were a little hamstrung by wanting to show the Lions as being reasonably similar (though obviously althropomorphised) to real-life, without actually outright stating it, since I doubt Disney's censors would have knowingly let through "Simba & Nala are incestuous half siblings" regardless of the reason.
As to #3, I may have to watch that through again :). I admittedly looked at that (last time I watched it) as a "Brains vs Brawn" situation, and Scar playing up being a sarcastic wuss to Mufasa purely so that Mufasa doesn't see him as a threat and disembowel him. Scar seemed much more 'traditional male' when dealing with the Hyenas (and "Be Prepared", in spite of scaring the shit out of me as a kid, remains my favorite Disney song EVER!).
Re #2. Well, I can see giving differing accents to differing species as being a good way to show their differences, the lineup of accent vs role kinda can't be argued with.
Any idea if this accent lineup remains constant in dubbed versions of the film?
Aw, thanks for the kind words, commenters!
ReplyDeleteAs for kitty incest, are there really no other male lions in the pride? I thought there were usually more than two in a pride of lions, having to fight it out for alpha status...
I don't think there are in the film, and certainly not in the stage show (although I think possibly in some casts male singers/dancers are included among the lioness chorus, they're still dressed and performing as female lions).
When Mufasa-the-almighty (bastard) reduces a species to the point where the rallying cry for them to commit regicide is "Stick with me and you'll never go hungry again", there's something very wrong with your "Circle of life"
Yes, this! And extra hisses for the idea that *not* accepting your own second-best status as a matter of course is what makes you 'evil' and thus worthy of hatred/mockery.
However, if we do we're left with a Pride with no males, which means we either leave and join another pride, go find a male somewhere, or die out",
This is a good point. I'm still not convinced that the biological fact that a pride that can't produce cubs from somewhere = a pride with no future is uppermost in the minds of kids watching the film though -- IIRC, it is very much 'We need a king!', not 'We need a husband for Princess Nala' (which, gross as it is, might actually still be a preferable message from my perspective).
I guess I'd thought about Nala beatingt the snot out of Simba and then dragging him back home as a "Sensible female childhood friend beats the shit out of spoiled male brat until he stands up and takes responsibility" type of situation.
Yeah, I think that's pretty much what they were going for. It may be picky of me, but I guess I don't want to accept 'sensible female childhood friend who does the hard work of getting the responsibility accepted, then steps back to get very little of the credit' as good enough, y'know?
Any idea if this accent lineup remains constant in dubbed versions of the film?
I don't know enough about the politics of accents in any language other than English to pick up the nuances, unfortunately. However, I do think that the dub of 'Be Prepared' in German is somewhat badass: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKOJ5bEKPLY&feature=related (link is to a YouTube clip: as ever, avoid reading the comments!)
Neo_Leviathan again
ReplyDeleteVery good point on Nala effectively doing all the work and not getting the credit :(
Hrm. A thought occurs, I'm utterly terrible at knowing timelines of feminism, did the movie come out anywhere at all near to a cultural trend of "Men may seem to do all the work but there's always a woman behind them making it happen"? If so maybe they were trying to show that, hoping that people would pick up on how dodgy it is?
No idea if that will even come out close to the truth, it's just a random thought :)
And I dare say you're probably right that "Oh no! Without a King the pride can't have cubs!" was going to be rather far from the minds of kids watching it...
I think one of the TVTropes commenters is quite right with the Lion King. A lot of bits and pieces, including the incest, Lions chasing off Hyenas from their hunting grounds, infighting over who gets to be the Alpha, etc etc, are all quite normal for Lions. If the show just showed them as animals, it'd be acceptable, but highly anthropomorphising everyone and keeping those behaviours the same just turn them into squicky bastards.
You mean female kitty cats don't procreate?
ReplyDelete"This has been bothering me for SIXTEEN YEARS now: Seriously, who the hell is Nala’s father?"
*google search* oh, THAT'S how mitosis works...
As for #2, you should check out Rosina Lippi-Green's book called, I believe, Speaking English with an Accent. She has a whole chapter on accents in Disney movies-- it came out pre-Lion King, I think, but I do remember her talking a lot about Beauty and the Beast so it can't have been much pre-Lion King. Anyway, she makes a bunch of observations similar to yours about the (troubling) way accent is used in a whole range of Disney movies.
ReplyDelete